A California judge, Jeffrey Ferguson, is facing accusations of killing his wife in Anaheim Hills last year. Despite being held behind bars at the Twin Towers Correctional Facility in Los Angeles County, Judge Ferguson is still receiving his annual salary of nearly $250,000. The 74-year-old judge, who was a former prosecutor before becoming a judge in 2015, allegedly shot his 65-year-old wife, Sheryl Ferguson, on August 3, 2023.
Initially released on $1 million bail, Judge Ferguson was sent back to jail after reportedly lying about consuming alcohol while awaiting trial. He continues to receive his salary, which totaled over $220,000 in 2023, along with $22,000 in benefits. The compensation has not been suspended despite the serious allegations against him.
Facing a felony murder charge with two felony enhancements related to firearm use and causing bodily harm, Judge Ferguson could potentially face 40 years to life in prison if convicted on all counts. Although he has pleaded not guilty, prosecutors claim he confessed to the killing in text messages to his court clerk and bailiff after the incident.
According to prosecutors, the fatal shooting occurred after an argument between Judge Ferguson and his wife at a restaurant, which escalated when they returned home. Allegedly under the influence of alcohol, Judge Ferguson retrieved a pistol from his ankle holster and shot his wife in the chest. Their adult son attested to his father’s intoxication during the altercation.
While the California Constitution dictates that a judge facing felony charges cannot continue to act as a judge, it does not mandate the loss of salary during this period. Only after a felony conviction would a judge be suspended without pay. This provision explains why Judge Ferguson is still receiving his salary despite the serious nature of the accusations against him.
The case of Judge Jeffrey Ferguson raises questions about the legal and ethical implications of judges continuing to receive their salaries while facing criminal charges. It highlights the complexities of judicial compensation and the need for clearer guidelines in such situations to ensure accountability and justice in the legal system.
