U.S. officials are cautious about changing a policy that would allow Ukraine to use long-range missiles to strike deep into Russia. The Intelligence Committee (IC) and Pentagon have advised against modifying the policy, stating that the costs would outweigh the benefits. They believe that changing the policy would not have a significant strategic impact on the war, especially since there are limited targets within the range of the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS).
In August, the IC reported that Russia had moved the majority of its aircraft out of the ATACMS range, diminishing the effectiveness of using long-range missiles to combat glide bombs. Additionally, Ukraine lacks sufficient ATACMS stocks, and the Department of Defense (DOD) has warned that depleting U.S. stocks for Ukraine could compromise military readiness.
President Biden has not definitively rejected the idea of providing long-range missiles to Ukraine but has expressed concerns about the potential costs. A U.S. official mentioned that considering Russia’s nuclear capabilities and the risk of escalation, it is crucial to weigh the potential consequences of such a policy change.
The official emphasized that Russia’s actions should also be taken into account, especially in light of recent events such as attempted acts of sabotage and escalating tensions. While the U.S. is exploring other options, including imposing more sanctions, discussions are ongoing with allies to determine the best course of action.
The issue of North Korean troops in Russia further complicates the situation, with uncertainties about their intentions and possible involvement in the conflict. White House national security spokesperson John Kirby highlighted the need to monitor the situation closely and respond accordingly to any developments involving North Korean soldiers in Russia.
During Ukrainian President Zelenskyy’s recent visit to the U.S., he presented his “victory plan,” which included a request to lift restrictions on long-range missiles for Ukraine. The claim was made that these missiles could help deter Russia’s use of deadly glide bombs, prompting increased pressure on President Biden to reconsider the policy.
As the discussions continue and tensions escalate, the decision on providing long-range missiles to Ukraine remains a complex and sensitive issue that requires careful consideration of the potential risks and benefits involved. The evolving situation in Eastern Europe demands a strategic and diplomatic approach to ensure stability and security in the region.
