Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI) programs are gaining popularity across the United States, with more than 100 pilots launched since 2018. Michael D. Tubbs, the president of Mayors for Guaranteed Income, explained the reasons behind cities launching these pilot programs. As the former mayor of Stockton, California, Tubbs founded the organization after identifying a lack of economic opportunity in Stockton and beyond.
Tubbs recognized that a GBI program on a large scale would require federal government involvement due to budget limitations faced by cities. Despite this, he believed in testing the idea at a smaller scale to gather data that could be used to advocate for federal action. Mayors for Guaranteed Income has grown into a coalition of 150 mayors advocating for pilot GBI programs, offering up to $1,000 a month to low-income participants without conditions.
Although studies have shown the benefits of these pilot programs, some face challenges related to funding and legality. Tubbs emphasized the need for federal government intervention to implement GBI programs effectively, similar to the child tax credit initiative. He also highlighted the role of local governments in inspiring and urging federal action.
Several cities have embraced GBI programs, including Austin, Texas, which allocated $1.3 million to sustain its program. In Cambridge, Massachusetts, a successful pilot program expanded city-wide with $22 million in COVID relief funds. Phoenix, Arizona, implemented a universal basic income program for low-income families using federal relief funds.
However, challenges exist in sustaining these programs, with issues related to funding and legal constraints. For instance, Harris County, Texas, faced a setback when the state Supreme Court ruled against its guaranteed income program. Despite opposition and criticism, Tubbs remains optimistic, noting that American voters, including 40% of Republicans, support guaranteed income initiatives.
Critics of GBI programs, according to Tubbs, may be disconnected from the realities faced by their communities. He believes that elected officials who oppose GBI programs might be out of touch with their constituents. Tubbs emphasizes the importance of public support for such initiatives, regardless of political affiliations.
In conclusion, the growing trend of GBI programs reflects a broader shift towards addressing economic disparities and providing financial stability to vulnerable populations. While challenges persist, advocates like Tubbs remain committed to advancing GBI initiatives at both local and national levels. By highlighting the successes and benefits of these programs, proponents aim to influence policymakers and secure sustainable funding for GBI initiatives nationwide.
