Policy Requires University Leaders in Wisconsin to Remain Neutral on Controversial Topics
Universities in Wisconsin are now required to adhere to a new policy that mandates their leaders to remain neutral when it comes to public statements on political and social issues. This policy, released by the university system on Friday, emphasizes that university leaders should only make public statements on matters directly affecting school operations. The goal of this policy is to uphold academic freedom, freedom of expression, and create an environment where diverse ideas can be freely discussed and debated within the university community.
The policy applies to a wide range of university leaders, including the system president and vice presidents, university chancellors, provosts, vice chancellors, deans, directors, department chairs, and anyone else who may be seen as speaking on behalf of a system institution. Any expression of support or opposition must be approved by UW system President Jay Rothman or the university’s chancellor to ensure viewpoint neutrality.
Solidarity or empathy statements should be avoided if they imply support for one group’s viewpoint over another, as stated in the new policy. However, faculty and staff are not restricted by this policy when expressing their expertise or judgment related to their academic discipline or research expertise. They are cautioned to be mindful when posting such statements on university-owned channels to prevent any misconceptions about representing the institution. Personal statements made by faculty and staff on non-university-owned channels are not subject to this policy.
Rothman and university chancellors are allowed to establish additional guidelines and procedures requiring faculty and staff to include disclaimers when not representing the institution. This policy does not grant them the authority to limit the free expression rights of individuals or groups who do not claim to speak on behalf of the institution. The policy, effective immediately, was implemented without the need for approval from the board of regents.
This new policy was prompted by a controversial agreement made by UW-Milwaukee Chancellor Mark Mone with anti-Israel demonstrators in May, which caused backlash from Jewish groups. The agreement included calling for a cease-fire in the conflict between Israel and Hamas and discussing the possibility of cutting ties with Israeli companies. Rothman criticized Mone’s decision, emphasizing the importance of maintaining viewpoint neutrality on campuses.
In response, Mone announced his resignation next year, citing the need for time to find his replacement. Republican lawmakers have long criticized higher education institutions for allegedly censoring conservative voices while welcoming liberal viewpoints. Some have advocated for federal legislation to protect free speech on college campuses and enforce penalties for infringing on individuals’ freedom of speech.
The American Civil Liberties Union and its Wisconsin chapter have not yet provided a response to these developments. As universities navigate the complexities of political and social issues, the balance between academic freedom and viewpoint neutrality remains a central concern for ensuring a diverse and inclusive campus environment.