The world’s largest airline pilot union, the Air Line Pilots Association, Int’l, has proposed eliminating certain terms from cockpit operations that they believe may be offensive to women and LGBTQ individuals. The union, which represents over 70,000 pilots worldwide, released a diversity, equity, and inclusion language guide in 2021 that lists terms and phrases to avoid, particularly those that are considered “masculine generalizations” and non-inclusive.
One of the terms the union suggested replacing is “cockpit,” which they recommend changing to “flight deck” due to its potentially derogatory connotations that exclude women in the piloting profession. The term “cockpit” has historical origins in cockfighting in 16th century England and evolved to describe a tense and confined atmosphere, similar to the area on British warships where surgeons treated the wounded.
Additionally, the language guide advises against using terms like “man,” “men,” “guys,” “mother/father,” “husband/wife,” and “boyfriend/girlfriend” in favor of more gender-neutral language that is inclusive of all individuals. While the union emphasizes the importance of inclusive language in communications for solidarity, collective strength, and flight safety, some critics argue that diversity initiatives in the airline industry may not directly correlate with ensuring safe travel.
Former Federal Aviation Administration safety team representative, Kyle Bailey, expressed skepticism about the emphasis on diversity in aviation, stating that piloting has traditionally been a male-dominated occupation. He believes that qualifications, experience, and training are more critical factors in ensuring aviation safety than diversity initiatives. Major airlines like United Airlines have faced criticism for their diversity initiatives, with CEO Scott Kirby receiving backlash for promoting higher representation of women and minority workers in pilot classes.
Critics like Elon Musk and J. Michael Waller have questioned the focus on diversity initiatives in the airline industry, suggesting that merit-based qualifications should take precedence over diversity quotas. While diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts aim to address historical discrimination and promote equal opportunities, the debate over the impact of these initiatives on aviation safety and industry practices continues.
Overall, the discussion around modernizing language in aviation and promoting inclusivity in the industry raises important questions about balancing diversity initiatives with traditional qualifications and safety standards in aviation operations. As the industry continues to evolve, finding a harmonious approach that prioritizes both safety and inclusivity will be crucial for shaping the future of aviation.
