The judge in the defamation lawsuit against CNN ruled that U.S. Navy veteran Zachary Young did not act illegally or criminally, despite the network’s reports. Young claims CNN smeared him and his company, Nemex Enterprises Inc., by implying illegal profiteering during the Afghanistan withdrawal in 2021. Judge William S. Henry stated that Young did not act criminally and CNN’s statements were concerning Young. The segment in question implied that Young was exploiting desperate Afghans by charging exorbitant fees for evacuation services. However, the judge found no evidence of criminal behavior by Young.
CNN argued that Young may have violated Taliban or Sharia law, but the judge dismissed these claims. CNN’s use of the term “black market” to describe Young’s actions was found to be of concern. The court also noted that the segment did not specifically state that Young was operating in a black market. A civil trial is set to take place in January 2025 in Florida.
The lawsuit could potentially expose CNN’s financial secrets as the court seeks to determine the network’s net worth. This case highlights the importance of responsible journalism and the impact of media reporting on individuals and businesses. It serves as a reminder to verify facts before making damaging accusations. The outcome of this trial will likely have implications for how news organizations report on sensitive issues in the future.