After Kamala Harris selected Tim Walz as her VP pick, Democrats quickly labeled him as a moderate midwesterner to deflect from his controversial actions. During the 2020 Minneapolis riots, Walz took three days to call in the National Guard, which left many wondering why it took so long. His response to questions about his decisions seemed evasive and lacking in clarity.
Greg Gutfeld, a Fox News personality, criticized Walz for his handling of the riots, calling him “bat s— crazy.” Gutfeld accused Walz of prioritizing the rights of criminals over law-abiding citizens and failing to protect businesses from looting and destruction. He also criticized Walz for his strict COVID-19 restrictions, such as setting up a hotline for reporting neighbors not wearing masks outdoors and imposing limits on gatherings and businesses.
Additionally, Gutfeld raised concerns about Walz’s support for gender reassignment procedures for minors and his alleged embellishment of his military service record. Gutfeld highlighted the contradictions in the left’s portrayal of Walz as a moderate figure while ignoring his controversial policies and decisions.
Despite the criticisms, Walz continues to be considered a potential vice presidential candidate, with some praising his military background and support for gun ownership. The shifting narratives around Walz reflect broader changes in political discourse, where once-disparaged qualities are now being embraced for their perceived appeal to voters.
As the debate over Walz’s suitability for higher office continues, it remains to be seen how his actions and policies will impact his political future. The contradictions in his public image raise questions about the shifting priorities and values within the political landscape, as well as the challenges of navigating complex issues in a polarized society.