Judge Judy Sheindlin recently shared her thoughts on the case involving Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s prosecution of former President Trump, describing it as “nonsense.” In an interview with CNN host Chris Wallace, Judge Judy criticized the use of taxpayer money for what she deemed a frivolous case.
As a property owner in Manhattan, Judge Judy expressed her preference for the district attorney to focus on addressing crime that affects citizens on a daily basis, such as ensuring safety on the streets and public transportation. She questioned the decision to spend millions of dollars prosecuting Trump on charges related to falsifying business records, arguing that the resources could be better used elsewhere.
While acknowledging Trump’s success as a businessman and his popularity on the reality TV show “The Apprentice,” Judge Judy was critical of his presidency. She expressed her belief that Trump was not suited for the role of president and doubted his own expectations of winning the election.
In addition to her commentary on the case and Trump’s presidency, Judge Judy also shared her support for former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley during the 2024 Republican presidential primary. As a political independent, Judge Judy’s perspective on the legal proceedings and political landscape adds a unique insight to the ongoing discussions surrounding the former president’s legal troubles.
Overall, Judge Judy’s remarks highlight the complexities of the legal system, the allocation of resources, and the public perception of high-profile cases involving prominent political figures. Her perspective as a taxpayer, property owner, and former judge offers a valuable contribution to the ongoing dialogue about justice, accountability, and political leadership in the United States.
