news-10082024-093051

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, who is also the Democratic vice presidential candidate, recently clarified a statement he made in a 2018 video regarding the use of weapons in war. A spokesperson for the Harris campaign stated that Governor Walz “misspoke” in the video when he mentioned handling weapons “in war.”

The Harris campaign spokesperson emphasized that Governor Walz would never disrespect the service of any American and thanked Senator Vance for his service to the country. The spokesperson explained that Governor Walz believes that only military members trained to handle such weapons should have access to them. This clarification came in response to criticism from Republicans, including vice presidential candidate JD Vance, regarding Walz’s military service.

Governor Walz, who served in the National Guard for 24 years but never deployed to a war zone, mentioned in the video that weapons of war should only be used in war. This statement sparked backlash from Vance, who accused Walz of “stolen valor” and questioned his military service. Vance, a Marine Corps veteran who served in Iraq, called out Walz for allegedly lying about his military experience.

The Trump campaign also weighed in on the issue, with communications director Steven Cheung criticizing Walz for not addressing the controversy directly. Cheung accused Walz of being a “liar and fraud” and questioned his credibility as a candidate for vice president.

Despite the backlash, there are voices in support of Governor Walz, including a former Republican colleague who served with him in the House. This colleague praised Walz’s character and expressed confidence in his ability to serve as vice president.

In conclusion, the clarification from Governor Walz regarding his statement on weapon use in war has sparked a debate among political circles. While some criticize his military service and accuse him of dishonesty, others stand by his side and defend his integrity. The controversy surrounding this issue highlights the intense scrutiny that political candidates face during election campaigns.